THE HONEST GLOSSARY

Every pricing trick, defined in plain English

The vocabulary of SaaS pricing, defined honestly — with the number of tools in our 248-dossier corpus that carry each pattern, and a documented example from the wild.

Sticker price

The sticker price is the advertised headline price of a software plan. It is the number vendors market — but in our researched corpus, only about one in three tools has a sticker price that is also the whole story: meters, seats and add-ons move the real bill.

More on this →

Usage-based pricing (metered pricing)

Usage-based or metered pricing charges on top of (or instead of) a flat subscription: credits, message or minute counts, overage fees or percentage cuts. Done openly it is fair; done quietly it makes the advertised plan price meaningless once you have real volume.

Seen in 70 of 248 researched tools.

In the wild — Browse.ai: “A credit ≈ 10 extracted rows; premium sites cost more credits.” review →

More on this →

Per-seat pricing

Per-seat pricing scales the bill with every user, member or agent you add. Predictable at small size, but it quietly taxes growth: doubling your team doubles the software bill even when usage barely changes. Flat-fee alternatives exist in most categories.

Seen in 66 of 248 researched tools.

In the wild — Assembly: “Rewards (gift-card redemptions) are funded separately from the per-seat fee.” review →

More on this →

Quote-only pricing (hidden pricing)

Quote-only or hidden pricing means the vendor publishes no usable price list — you must book a sales call to learn what it costs. It enables per-customer price discrimination and makes comparison shopping impossible before you invest time in a demo.

Seen in 20 of 248 researched tools.

In the wild — Increff: “Custom, quote-based (2026), with a free WMS trial in select regions.” review →

More on this →

Renewal jump

A renewal jump is the gap between the introductory price you sign at and the higher rate your subscription renews at — standing practice in hosting and security software. The honest question is never the intro price but the year-two price.

Seen in 7 of 248 researched tools.

In the wild — ChemiCloud: “Note the renewal: standard rates run roughly 3x the intro price (often ~$9.95–$14.95/mo).” review →

More on this →

Annual lock-in

An annual lock-in means the advertised price only exists with a yearly (or longer) commitment; monthly billing costs meaningfully more or is unavailable. It shifts risk to the buyer: you pay for a year before you know whether the tool sticks.

Seen in 23 of 248 researched tools.

In the wild — UniTel Voice: “Extra numbers about $5/mo each; roughly 30% off on annual billing.” review →

More on this →

Genuinely free tier

A genuinely free tier is a plan you can run on indefinitely at zero cost — not a fourteen-day trial in a costume. The honest test: can a real, small use case live on it forever? In our corpus, about four in ten tools pass.

Seen in 101 of 248 researched tools.

In the wild — Sellfy: “0% transaction fees on all plans; 14-day trial, no free tier.” review →

More on this →

Free trial vs free plan

A free trial ends; a free plan does not. Vendors often market trials as 'free' — the honest distinction is whether the tool remains usable at zero cost after the clock runs out, or whether every path leads to a paywall within weeks.

More on this →

Price-hike registry

A price-hike registry documents SaaS price increases, free-tier cuts and plan retirements with evidence — because vendors quietly delete old pricing pages. AIBM's registry snapshots every monitored pricing page monthly and archives independent receipts at the Wayback Machine.

More on this →

Pay-to-play awards

Pay-to-play awards are industry prizes that require entry fees, sponsorships or paid licensing of winner badges — the economics reward payment, not merit. The honest alternative: awards drawn from published research, where vendors cannot apply and evidence is shown per winner.

More on this →

Evidence-based review

An evidence-based software review ties every claim to a verifiable source: documented prices, quoted terms, archived pages. The practical test is whether the reviewer publishes the evidence next to the verdict — and says 'skip it' when that is the honest answer.

More on this →

Definitions are editorial; corpus numbers are computed from hand-researched dossiers (open data). Some links are affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you; it never changes a definition.