Growth tools only earn their keep if they move a real number — leads, conversions or revenue — not just activity. So where does Campaigner actually fit? Most people land here while weighing it against Mailchimp, so that is the comparison this review keeps coming back to: does it do the job you actually need, without charging you for the parts you don't?
Visit Campaigner → Affiliate link — the rest of this page is the honest version, including who should skip it.
Same honest take, in video form — from our YouTube channel.
⚡ Short on time? Watch the 30-second verdict Short.
Email and SMS marketing for mid-market senders with larger lists. The useful features start high — automation and API only arrive on Essential at about $179/month, while Starter at $59 is a sending tool rather than an automation platform. Contact-based pricing bills dormant subscribers too.

(2026) Contact-based: Starter about $59/mo (5,000 contacts, no automation/API); Essential ~$179/mo (25k contacts, dynamic content, 1,000 SMS); Advanced ~$649/mo (100k, workflows, API); an eCommerce plan runs ~$79.95-149.95/mo. 30-day trial requires a card and auto-converts. Plans change — always verify the live price on their site.
Correction after re-checking: (2026) Contact-based and billed per account rather than per user; a contact slider sets the tier and there is no separate monthly/annual toggle. Two self-serve plans: Essentials from $14/mo at 1,000 contacts ($38 at 5,000, $158 at 25,000, $409 at 100,000) and Advanced from $35/mo at 1,000 contacts ($70 at 5,000, $258 at 25,000, $649 at 100,000), plus a quote-only Custom tier. Essentials excludes automation workflows and conversion tracking, but does include the REST API, webhooks and SFTP. Landing pages, sub-accounts and white-label are Custom-tier only. SMS/MMS is not bundled into any plan — it is pay-as-you-go from $0.009 per message and gated behind sales. Reputation Defender is an add-on at 20% of plan cost. The 30-day trial is full-feature but requires a card and auto-charges when it ends. (re-verified 31 Jul 2026)

Two paragraphs of fine print worth reading: automation and API only arrive at the $179 tier — the Starter plan is a sending tool, not a marketing-automation platform — and the trial auto-converts to paid if you don't actively cancel, which tells you something about the retention strategy. Contact-based pricing also means dormant subscribers bill like active ones; prune first.
Recurring themes from Capterra, TrustRadius and Business.com, read in August 2026. We have not run Campaigner ourselves, so this is other buyers' experience rather than ours. We summarise it here because the complaints are usually the part a vendor page leaves out.
There is no free tier — only a 30-day trial that takes a card. The real decision is Essentials versus Advanced, and pricing scales by contact count, not per user: $14 versus $35 a month at 1,000 contacts, $158 versus $258 at 25,000, $409 versus $649 at 100,000. The limit that bites first is automation. Essentials has no workflows at all — no time-based, rules-based or conditional triggers, no delay nodes — no conversion tracking, and no way to remove the Campaigner footer branding. Stay on Essentials if you broadcast a scheduled newsletter to one list: you still get the drag-and-drop editor, A/B and multivariate testing, dynamic segments, the REST API, webhooks and SFTP. Advanced pays for itself the moment you want one triggered sequence, or want to attribute revenue to a send. Upgrading does not fix the ceiling above it. Landing pages, sub-accounts, SSO and white-label stay quote-only on the Custom tier. The media library is capped at 50MB on every plan, Reputation Defender adds 20% of plan cost at any tier, and SMS stays pay-as-you-go behind a sales conversation.
Start the 30-day trial — full-feature, but it takes a card and charges automatically when the trial ends unless you cancel first. Fix the sending identity before anything else. Campaigner's knowledge base carries separate articles for validating a business From domain instead of a Gmail or Yahoo address and for SPF, DKIM and DMARC records, and its deliverability page describes authentication as something its team walks through with you — so treat DNS as a task with lead time, not a checkbox. Then run the import wizard, build in the drag-and-drop editor, and schedule. Distilled from vendor pricing and SMS pricing pages, anti-spam policy and terms & conditions, the deliverability and tutorials pages, and the knowledge-base article index
Where Campaigner setups actually go wrong, and what it costs you when they do. Same sources as the setup notes above — not from a walkthrough we ran ourselves.
The trap is the first big send.
Both columns come from the same place: each vendor’s own published pricing, read on the date shown in the sources at the foot of this page. We do not average them into a score.
The natural comparison is Campaign Monitor or ActiveCampaign — Campaign Monitor shares the polish, ActiveCampaign beats it on automation depth — compare at your real list size and feature floor. Weigh it against Mailchimp on the job you actually need done.
Everything we publish about Campaigner links back here — the review stays the honest hub:
The ex-banker filter — the same yardstick on every review (how we review): My ex-banker filter is simple: does Campaigner remove a real cost — time, errors, missed revenue — bigger than what it charges? If the job above is genuinely yours, it's worth a look. We never publish fake or “exclusive” prices, so always confirm the current plan on their site.
It depends on whether you have the bottleneck it solves. Small teams get the most out of this category when one clear problem is already costing real hours or revenue; buying ahead of that just adds cost and another login. Price it against the hours or lost deals it removes, not against its feature list, and start on the smallest plan that covers the job.
Skip it if you're small (the useful features start at $179/mo) or you dislike card-required auto-converting trials on principle. Buying a tool to fix a problem you don't have yet just adds cost and another login to manage.
This is a researched assessment, not a hands-on test — where we've used a tool ourselves, we say so explicitly. We name what each tool is genuinely good and bad at, and we earn a commission only if you sign up, at no cost to you.
We list our sources because most review sites do not. How we review →
Weighing Campaigner against the field? These are the growth & revenue tools closest to it that we have also reviewed. They overlap rather than match, so check what each one is actually built for before treating any of them as a swap:
New dossiers, cost-traps we found, and tools that earned a keep — no hype, no sponsored-disguised-as-advice. Unsubscribe anytime.
This is our researched assessment — not a paid placement. The “Visit” links on this page are affiliate links: we may earn a commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you, and it never changes our take. How we review →
Spotted an error? Tell us — we verify and fix fast, whether or not it flatters the product.