The IT and productivity layer is where small, reliable tools quietly give you hours back — or, done wrong, add another login to babysit. So where does Convert actually fit?
Privacy-first A/B testing platform \u2014 experiments, personalization and feature rollouts, priced by tested users, with a 15-day free trial.

(2026) 15-day free trial. Growth $399/mo, or $299/mo paid annually ($3,588/yr), for 100K tested users a month; Pro $599/mo, or $420/mo annually ($5,040/yr); Enterprise on request. Overuse is metered — $399 per extra 100K on Growth, $699 per 250K on Pro (it can be switched off) — and each additional custom domain costs $1,000/year. Plans change — always verify the live price on their site.

The meter is tested users, and it keeps running: blow past your monthly allowance and overuse blocks land at $399-699 unless you hard-cap them — and every extra custom domain is $1,000 a year. The friendly $299 headline assumes annual prepay; month-to-month is $399.
The natural comparison is VWO — VWO is the broad experimentation suite where testing is one module; Convert focuses squarely on A/B testing with GDPR-first positioning — compare the add-on costs (API, domains) on both before deciding. Decide by which one fits the job above, not by the louder brand.
My ex-banker filter is simple: does Convert remove a real cost — time, errors, missed revenue — bigger than what it charges? If the job above is genuinely yours, it's worth a look. We never publish fake or “exclusive” prices, so always confirm the current plan on their site.
It depends on the job. Convert is best for CRO teams running serious A/B and multivariate testing who want a privacy-first, GDPR-friendly alternative to the big experimentation suites; if that's you, it tends to pay for itself in saved time. If not, hold off. We don't publish fixed prices because they change — check Convert's live pricing before deciding.
Skip it if your traffic is modest — statistical significance needs volume, and 100K tested users a month is more than most small sites can use — or your landing-page tool's built-in testing covers it. Buying a tool to fix a problem you don't have yet just adds cost and another login to manage.
This is a researched assessment, not a hands-on test — where we've used a tool ourselves, we say so explicitly. We name what each tool is genuinely good and bad at, and we earn a commission only if you sign up, at no cost to you.
Weighing Convert against the field? These are the closest marketing tools we've reviewed — same job, different trade-offs:
New dossiers, cost-traps we found, and tools that earned a keep — no hype, no sponsored-disguised-as-advice. Unsubscribe anytime.
This is our researched assessment — not a paid placement. The link above is an affiliate link: we may earn a commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you, and it never changes our take. How we review →