Home › Comparisons › Top Echelon vs Bullhorn
HONEST COMPARISONTwo tools, one job. Here is the trade-off as our research found it — no winner-by-default, no invented numbers.
In the dossier the field is broader: “Bullhorn or Recruit CRM” — this page focuses on the most common head-to-head.
| BBullhorn | ||
|---|---|---|
| PRICING | TE Recruit (the ATS and CRM) runs $75 per seat per month billed annually or $89 month-to-month on Standard, and $89 billed annually or $110 month-to-month on Professional. | No full dossier yet — verify on their site. |
| GENUINELY BEST FOR | recruiting agencies and SMB staffing firms that want an applicant tracking system and CRM in one place, especially ones that would actually work split placements with other recruiters | No full dossier yet — verify on their site. |
| SKIP IT IF | you are an in-house talent team hiring for your own company — this is built around agency and split-placement workflows, so you would carry a network you never use | No full dossier yet — verify on their site. |
| THE HONEST KNOCK | Almost everything people shop for sits in Professional, not Standard: Smart-TE AI, automations, sequences, inbound email sync and API access are all one tier up, so Standard is a competent but plain ATS. | No full dossier yet — verify on their site. |

Pick Top Echelon if you’re recruiting agencies and SMB staffing firms that want an applicant tracking system and CRM in one place, especially ones that would actually work split placements with other recruiters. Walk away if you are an in-house talent team hiring for your own company — this is built around agency and split-placement workflows, so you would carry a network you never use — in that case the comparison above tells you where to look instead.
Try Top Echelon →Read the full Top Echelon review
There is no universal winner — it depends on the job. Top Echelon and Bullhorn solve the same job with different bets — Bullhorn as the agency-ATS incumbents. The honest side-by-side below shows who each is genuinely for.
Top Echelon is genuinely best for recruiting agencies and SMB staffing firms that want an applicant tracking system and CRM in one place, especially ones that would actually work split placements with other recruiters. Skip it if you are an in-house talent team hiring for your own company — this is built around agency and split-placement workflows, so you would carry a network you never use.
Almost everything people shop for sits in Professional, not Standard: Smart-TE AI, automations, sequences, inbound email sync and API access are all one tier up, so Standard is a competent but plain ATS.
This comparison is our researched assessment — not a paid placement. Some links are affiliate links: we may earn a commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you, and it never changes the take. How we review →