🔎
Unclaimed — this is our research, not their listing. Miro has not submitted anything to us, has not seen or approved this page, and is not a partner of ours. There is no vendor description here, and we have not written one on their behalf. Everything below comes from our own dossier — the same one behind
the Honest Software Atlas. Reader reviews are moderated for spam only; critical ones get published too.
What we found — independently
Researched by AIBM, not supplied by the vendor. The vendor has not been involved in this page at all.
Our pricing check · 2026A free plan (3 editable boards workspace-wide, unlimited members, 10 AI credits/mo); Starter about $8/member/mo billed annually ($10 monthly), Business $20/member/mo annual ($25 monthly), Enterprise custom from 30 seats.
What will cost you money if you skim itPer-member pricing charges for every member added to the workspace, so an org-wide rollout multiplies at full headcount — and the free plan's 3-board cap is workspace-wide, not per person, so real teams outgrow it in days.
Cost-trap flags — each with its evidence
🪑 Per-seat pricing — Cost scales with every user you add
“Per-member pricing charges for every member added to the workspace, so an org-wide rollout multiplies at full headcount — and the free plan's 3-board…”
🧮 Usage-metered — Credits, overages or percentage fees on top of the subscription
“(2026) A free plan (3 editable boards workspace-wide, unlimited members, 10 AI credits/mo); Starter about $8/member/mo billed annually ($10 monthly),…”
🆓 Free tier — A genuinely free plan or version exists
“(2026) A free plan (3 editable boards workspace-wide, unlimited members, 10 AI credits/mo); Starter about $8/member/mo billed annually ($10 monthly),…”
Genuinely good for
teams that think visually — brainstorms, flowcharts, retros, workshops and planning on an infinite shared canvas with strong templates and facilitation tools
Skip it if
your work is mostly documents or task tracking (a doc or PM tool fits better) or most of your company would only ever need to view, not edit
The honest comparisonFigJam or Lucidspark — FigJam wins if your designers already live in Figma, Lucidspark on diagram-heavy work; Miro wins on breadth: templates, integrations and workshop facilitation
Read our full Miro review →
Source: our own researched dossier on Miro, the same one behind the Honest Software Atlas and our reviews. Flags are derived from that text and each one carries the sentence it came from, so you can judge it yourself. Prices move — always check the vendor’s live pricing page before you buy.
Work at Miro? This page is yours the moment you claim it.Write your own description and it appears at the top of this page, in your words, free — no fee during beta and no strings. What does not change: our research stays exactly where it is, underneath, and you cannot edit it. That is the point of the page. Two honest caveats before you bother: our audience is still modest and growing, and the outbound link is nofollow ugc, so this is not an SEO play.
Claim this page — free →We have pre-filled the name, site and category we already have on file, so the only thing left to write is the description. A claimed page also drops the noindex we keep on research-only pages.