BrowserAct

Build a reusable web scraper from one prompt

Researched by AIBM Listed by the vendor

Affiliate disclosure: this is a partner link. We may earn a commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you. It does not change what our research says.

browseract.com
BrowserAct product page
Category

Developer Tools

Price

Free plan; paid from $13

Price basis

Basic · per month, annual

Our research

price read 24 Oct 2026

Check it for your team size and budget →
⚠️ Vendor-submitted listing — the description below is written by the vendor, not by AIBM. Our own independent findings are in the panel underneath it. Reader reviews are moderated for spam only; critical ones get published too.

From the vendor

In BrowserAct’s own words

Describe the web data you need. BrowserAct builds and verifies a reusable scraper on the live site, then runs it whenever you need fresh results. Collect structured data and files with one prompt and no code, build once and run again as pages change, and scale without managing browser infrastructure: BrowserAct manages browsers, proxies, CAPTCHA handling and capacity. Ready-made templates cover YouTube comments, Amazon best sellers, Reddit posts and Google Maps business listings. Free tier with 200 credits on signup (their pricing card, read 13 September 2026; it read 1,500 on 2 September).

Pricing: Free tier; Basic from $13/mo on yearly billing (vendor-stated — always verify on their site)

Written by BrowserAct. Not checked by us.

What we found — independently

Researched by AIBM, not supplied by the vendor. The vendor cannot edit this part of the page.

Our pricing check · re-verified 2026-10-24A credit-metered subscription with a free tier.
What will cost you money if you skim itThe free tier is the catch: its card reads 200 signup credits where it read 1,500 on 2 September, about 66 workflow steps at 3 credits a step, while the vendor's own llms.txt still advertises 2,000.

Cost-trap flags — each with its evidence

🧮 Usage-metered — Cost moves with usage: credits, overages, volume tiers or percentage fees
“(prices re-verified 2026-10-24 on browseract.com/pricing, every plan amount quoted from the page; last read in a live browser with both billing tabs open and cross-read against browseract.com/llms.txt on 2026-10-14; the plan amounts and credit meters were first read in this form on 2026-10-03) A credit-metered subscription with a free tier.”
🧩 Add-ons extra — Key features are paid add-ons on top of the plan
“Local CLI: $0 runtime fee; credits apply only to optional add-ons, a local fingerprint browser at 100 credits, dynamic proxy at 5,000 credits per GB, static proxies priced by location and tier without a figure.”
🆓 Free tier — A genuinely free plan or version exists
“(prices re-verified 2026-10-24 on browseract.com/pricing, every plan amount quoted from the page; last read in a live browser with both billing tabs open and cross-read against browseract.com/llms.txt on 2026-10-14; the plan amounts and credit meters were first read in this form on 2026-10-03) A credit-metered subscription with a free tier.”

Genuinely good for

teams that need a reusable web scraper or browser bot without writing selectors, want the browsers, proxies and CAPTCHA handling managed for them, and can commit to yearly billing -- at $13 a month Basic is a cheap way to run a few scheduled bots

Skip it if

you will bill month to month (20 to 25 percent more than yearly), you plan to run proxy-heavy jobs on the Local CLI (one gigabyte of dynamic proxy traffic is 5,000 credits, half of Basic's monthly pool) or to rely on the cloud proxy staying free, which the page says is for a limited time only, or you need a published overage rate before you commit, because the credit-pack price is not on the page

The honest comparisonBrowse.ai — Both turn a website into a scheduled, reusable data robot without code. Browse.ai is the older name and prices per robot run on a credit ladder that starts at $19 a month on annual billing, $48 monthly; BrowserAct starts lower at $13 yearly and bundles managed browsers, proxies and CAPTCHA solving into the same credit pool. If your bottleneck is blocked pages, BrowserAct's infrastructure is the difference; if it is simply extracting a table on a schedule, either does the job and Browse.ai has the longer track record.

Read our full BrowserAct review →

Source: our own researched dossier on BrowserAct, the same one behind the Honest Software Atlas and our reviews. Flags are derived from that text and each one carries the sentence it came from, so you can judge it yourself. Prices move — always check the vendor’s live pricing page before you buy.

Visit BrowserAct →

Affiliate disclosure: this is a partner link. We may earn a commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you. It does not change what our research says.

Listed 2026-09-04 · free beta listing · outbound links are sponsored nofollow · list your own SaaS

Open questions

What our research could not answer about BrowserAct

For the BrowserAct team: answer one of these questions (optional)

Your answer is read by a person before it is published, then shown here as a dated statement from your company, next to our research and never mixed into it. We publish your role and your email domain, never your name or address. Please link the page where it is documented.

For the BrowserAct team: share kit and badge (optional)

Manage your listing → update your text, price and images, and follow each change

Images and ready-to-edit text to announce your listing, if that helps. Optional: your listing stays exactly the same whether or not you share or link to it.

Landscape share image for BrowserAct
Landscape, 1200×630 · LinkedIn, X, Slack · Download
Square share image for BrowserAct
Square, 1080×1080 · Instagram, LinkedIn · Download

Short post

Longer post or newsletter

Badge for your site

Listed on AI Builder Marketplace